• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

kylie grace snyder

audio engineering, technology, and miscellany . . .

  • blog & news
  • teaching & research
  • CV
  • U-M Wiki
  • contact

proaudio

Snyder Hosts Central Indiana Audio Student Workshop 2012

news · 2012-04-15

On March 10, 2012 the Central Indiana Section of the Audio Engineering Society hosted the first annual Central Indiana Audio Student Workshop. The event was hosted by Section Chair Kyle P. Snyder, as well as assistant workshop host Jeffrey Seitz and with great assistance from the Executive Board of the Central Indiana Section, in the Music Media Production and Industry studios on the campus of Ball State University.

Like other regional events, the Central Indiana Audio Student Workshop was modeled like a mini-convention. The goal was to provide an intimate learning environment, open to anyone interested in audio, including local professionals, university students, and high school students. The Workshop provided attendees the opportunity to improve their skills with some of the best in the business, who presented on topics in recording, mixing, live sound, and acoustics.

6977539901_bbc05ae5e8_n
Snyder discussing workshop options with students at registration. Click for more pictures.

Snyder also wanted to provide the Workshop free of charge, to give students of all means equal access to the audio instruction we were providing. Also, not only did he strive to provide high-quality instruction for free, but wanted to incentivize attendance with useful giveaways from sponsors.

Finally, he wanted to ensure that an acceptable student to teacher ratio was achieved, so that students felt less like they were part of a crowd and more like they were in a small classroom where they could ask questions.

Event pre-registration topped out at 180, and the workshop saw physical attendance at 150 including numerous walk-in’s, reaching a group of audio students and professionals from every corner of the state and many from neighboring territories, who were appreciative beyond words. Snyder and his team couldn’t have been more pleased with how the event turned out.

For additional information on the event including sponsors, posters, artwork, schedules, and much more please visit the official event site.

Additionally, the official event report is available for download (pdf).

Press:

  • JAES v60.4 Section News
  • AES.org Student Blog
  • Synergistic Audio Concepts Blog
  • Sound & Video Contractor Online
  • ProSoundWeb.com

Review of The Pearl ELM-C for RecordingHacks.com

blog · 2012-02-17

On December 10th of 2011, I was privileged to record the Tuscaroras Philharmonic for their critically-acclaimed release of “As A Child Looks At Christmas Eve”. As part of this project I was blessed with a care package from Pearl Microphone Laboratory and their US distributor Independent Audio – a stereo pair of Pearl ELM-Cs – all thanks to Matt McGlynn at RecordingHacks.

I’m not going to give away the details here, though I certainly think the album is a good indicator of their success . . . and they might have earned a spot on my wish list. For all the details including audio clips and pictures, be sure to click through to the review.

Pearl ELM-C Review on RecordingHacks.com

Snyder Records Tuscarawas Philharmonic’s Historic Release

news · 2011-12-27

I’m pleased to announce that over the 2011 holiday season, one of my many projects in production was the Tuscarawas Philahmonic’s “As A Child Looks At Christmas Eve” which is now available on CD and will soon be available via digital distribution. I couldn’t be happier that this project has been so well received and I was tremendously blessed to work with such a talented ensemble, including conductor Eric Benjamin and singer/songwriter Alex Bevan.

From the release:

The Tuscarawas Philharmonic is pleased to announce the release of “As A Child Looks At Christmas Eve,”a live concert featuring critically acclaimed North-East Ohio native singer/songwriter Alex Bevan.

The cycle of songs, originally written by Bevan, takes the audience on the annual pilgrimage to bring out the family’s Christmas decorations for seasonal use, seen through the eyes of a child. In the process, they discover a box filled with cards which evoke powerful memories. Each song depicts a Christmas card, as well as the sentiments attached, and Bevan’s narration leads the audience on a magical journey at Christmas time.

Download Press Release

Press Coverage:

12.23.2011 –  The Times Reporter
12.12.2011 – Mitchell’s Studio Action Photos

Album Sample: Dancer on the Ice


A Multitude Of Digital Delivery Options For Studios Of All Sizes

blog · 2011-08-10

No matter the size of your operation, whether a single mix room with the occasional client or a full-time commercial operation with countless rooms and clients, it’s an absolutely certainty that at some point you’ll be exchanging files with clients. I recently had discussions with several clients which led me to reevaluate the current options available for studios, irregardless of size. So, let’s take a look at some of the different tools which are currently available!

FTP: The Original Standard
When I first began sharing data over the internet a very long time ago the golden standard was FTP. Due to the ubiquity and inexpensive cost of web hosting coupled with ease of administration, FTP certainly isn’t going anywhere fast. The only real downside of FTP is that is does require a bit of tech savvy from both users to properly administer and use properly. For my web hosting I currently rely upon Fatcow.com (ridiculously named, but also tremendously reliable, cheap, and green!). Setting up FTP access for a user varies from host to host but generally the steps consist of the following:

  • Create a folder for your user (I use the structure of root/clients/clientname).
  • Create a new FTP account which has access to only this folder.
  • Modify the newly created directories permissions to 755 (or 0755) which will prevent unauthorized browsing.
    • Note: If you don’t want to allow clients to link directly to files within their directory, but only want files to be transferred the client software, be certain to apply appropriate permissions to the files themselves.

If you’re looking for a free FTP client to point your client towards, a good open source option which works across all platforms is FileZille which I highly recommend. It’s worth noting that most hosts offer both FTP and SFTP (secure FTP) as options so you can ensure the security of your clients. Also, while relying on web host provided FTP is one option, some studios may feel far more common hosting their own serve in house or through many of the fine collocation services available.

Enterprise Class
As I said, my goal was to see what currently exists beyond FTP because you can easily see how management could be cumbersome for those looking for a more streamlined solution. So, first lets take a look at some more enterprise focused alternatives.

If you’ve been working in audio a while then one of the most recognizable names in asset delivery would have to be DigiDelivery. Now owned and serviced by Aspera, DigiDelivery has officially reached an end of life stage as a product and will no longer be supported after December of 2011. However, Aspera has brought to the table an entirely new offering, faspex, which promises greater compatibility and speed from a web based interface. This service which is named for the underlying fasp transport technology is absolutely worth a look for enterprise level operations currently evaluating file delivery options.

Budget Conscious Yet Versatile
Organizations still seeking a managed solution but striving to remain budget conscious have available to them a varying range of dedicated hosted storage options. One interesting and often overlooked technology is Microsoft Sharepoint, including the various options available from Sherweb and other excellent providers. While slightly pricy depending on how much storage you require, Sharepoint is quite compelling in that accounts can grow and shrink in size to fit your needs, and a virtually unlimited number of accounts can be created with different levels of file access, making it a technology worthy of consideration. Another solution which provides features and support similar to Sharepoint is Cloud Files from Rackspace. More commonly used to publicly serve files as a CDN, CloudFiles can also be used for transferring large volumes of data which is ideal for many studios.

Many organizations have found it advantageous to create their own custom client portals using their existing CMS which is a great way to utilize preexisting infrastructure. To do this you obviously need a web host and while I have my favorite (Fatcow), others have found Amazon S3 to be a worthy contender if not utilizing server scripts . If you’re familiar enough with web development to feel comfortable building a client portal you know that there are myriad options for construction. However, I’ve personally had great success using a heavily modified WordPress installation which, coupled with the right plugins, can turn the process of making individual client pages into a relatively simple process. It’s worth mentioning that client portals can provide both file upload and download functionality, although file upload must generally be baked in using a third party utility like cformsII.

Living In The Cloud
A file sharing option likely familiar to most individuals due in large part to its rapidly gaining popularity is the use of various (and often free dependent on storage reuirements) cloud storage services. For instance, YouSendIt is used by studios like TreeLady and MasterMix. A great implementation of a YouSendIt drop box is currently in use by TreeLady Studios which is absolutely worth a look. It’s worth noting that when using services like YouSendIt, clients can be emailed links to directly and securely download files.

If you’re looking for other cloud based services, Dropbox is worth a serious look. Much like YouSendIt, links to files can be securely emailed to clients, and when coupled with the excellent form submission tool Jotform, Dropbox can be used as a secure upload portal. Also, a new service worth mentioning is Gobbler which is fairly new to the storage scene. While I don’t have any firsthand experience with the service, reviews have been exceedingly positive, enough so that it’s certainly worth a look.

In the discussion of cloud services you may notice that offerings from Apple like MobileMe and iCloud are notably absent. While these are absolutely wonderful for consumers, Apple has proven over the years that they have little interest in supporting the long-term needs of business, therefore I feel they are not reliable for production usage.

In The End
When it comes to digital delivery options as with most things audio, it all comes down to your needs and personal taste. Your needs (or lack thereof) will likely eliminate half of the options I’ve just laid out, and from there it’s just a matter of what best fits your workflow. No matter what delivery method you ultimately you choose I hope you’ve found this helpful.

Are you using another tool for digital delivery I’ve missed? Have some advice you’d like to share? Be sure to let me know in the comments below!

Studio Basics: Conquering Data Management Best Practices

blog · 2011-07-22

It’s a fair bet that if you’re a recording engineer or spend any amount of time in the studio you’ve probably developed a fairly consistent method of saving and working with your data. That’s good because keeping track of your data before, during and after a session can be a daunting task.

Now, when we’re talking about data management there are three main elements.

  • Digital Data
    • This is exactly what you’d think– all the digital content you’ve created during a session.
  • Physical Data
    • Also rather self explanatory but far too often overlooked. Physical data is literally everything else from a session which includes track sheets, take sheets, recall notes, etc. All of that is worth saving too.
  • Asset Management
    • This isn’t necessarily a type of data you create, though it theoretically could be if you were utilizing meta-tags. However, depending on the type of environment in which you work there are several things you could be doing to make managing your physical and digital assets just a little bit easier.

I’d imagine that most engineers are far more secure in the organization of their digital data than their physical data, which is something I’m going to address.

First of all, it’s very important to keep in mind that if you work in a large production environment it’s almost a certainty that your employer has laid out a very particular method for you to manage your data. Obviously, whatever they say goes. However, what about everyone else? I mean, that’s a lot of us!

Digital Data
If you don’t follow a consistent method of digital data organization please start. I promise you’ll thank me later. If you’ve read any of my past articles it will come as no surprise that I’m a huge proponent of the various Technical Guidelines for Producers and Engineers set forth by The Recording Academy, which are free for members and non-members alike.

While these guidelines work well for me they aren’t for everyone and might not feel right to you. So, the best advice is to discover whatever organizational method works best for you, document it, and stick with it.

Physical Data
Once you have a handle on your digital data, it’s critical to properly address your physical data storage. One of the first things I do at the conclusion of a project is photocopy all documentation, including track sheets, take sheets, recall notes, and archive listings.

Then, whenever any physical data goes into either temporary or permanent storage, all elements of a project are kept together. This includes everything from CDs to multi-tracks and documents, all of which are stored in the same area of the same shelf.

I keep all these elements organized thanks to a wonderful box label I first discovered at the Banff Centre for the Arts and which I have since adapted for my own use. As I’ve said, you have to discover what works best for you, and there’s nothing quite like finding a pre-made solution which works great. You’ll notice that this label differs from that recommended by the Producers and Engineers wing media label recommendations, which I do use, but only for media I’m shipping. I use my own label for internal archiving.

Asset Management
With both your physical and digital data wrangled, you might be inclined to just stop there. However, there are several things you could be doing to make keeping track of all your data a great deal easier. Asset management is one area where those who work in large production environments with clearly defined data management policies have it far easier. After all, most larger operations employ their database du jour (from the exceedingly complex to a simple spreadsheet) which track projects using project numbers and their related assets. If you don’t run a database (I don’t) consider creating a project number field in your financial management program. We’re all invoicing clients, right? By leading with a project number on all folder names you can be assured to find what you’re looking for down the road. Similarly, be certain to label every piece of physical data with the same project number, including its storage box. This is where my handy dandy label comes in.

Finally, when it comes to asset management, I like to make sure I know exactly where session files are stored. For instance, what if you are a small studio but still have 30 or 40 hard drive of data kicking around? Sure, there might be better ways to handle the archive which is a discussion best handled in a far different article. But how do you keep track of your data?

First, I like to name each hard drive logically and sequentially. I use HDAUDIO_01, HDAUDIO_02, and so forth. When I’m archiving data, the name of this drive is written on the box so I can’t possibly loose the files. Because I’m a small operation, I also track these critical details in my invoicing application. I also like to print a physical copy of the directory listing which lives in the archive box, so I know the exact state of a project at any given time. There are several shareware applications which can accomplish this task, but if I’m working on a PC I like to utilize Directory List & Print, and on the Mac my tool of choice is Print Window.

Full Circle
As I’ve said, it can be quite a task to properly manage your data not only during session but once they’re completed. Thankfully, there are several things you can do to make the tasks far more manageable. Now, is what I’ve laid out the be all-end all for managing your data? If it is, frankly, I’d be surprised. Though I’m awfully seasoned in this area, my recommendations are what work best for my clients and me – your mileage may vary drastically.  So, get out there and discover what works best for you. But most importantly, please make certain you implement a solid data organization for your studio, and let me know what works for you because I’m very much interested!

Take A Moment To Observe World Backup Day & Evaluate Your Storage Strategies

blog, pswblog, recording, system maintenance · 2011-03-31

As some of you may have noticed, I’m far more paranoid than most about the backing up of data. However, today as we take a moment to remember (or in some cases, mourn) the passing of World Backup Day, I’m left wondering why so few people take data backup seriously.

Let me share with you a recent story from my own experience. Just yesterday, I took delivery of a shiny new RAID after my own (albeit brief) data scare. My single remaining non-RAID online drive had hesitated to mount previously in the week due to a mismatched power supply.

Thankfully, using the correct power supply immediately solved the problem. However, it left me with a sinking feeling that illustrated the importance of proper backups. After all, even those of us who backup regularly are not without fault, and I hadn’t yet made a safety of this particular project.

Surely most of you recording professionals out there have a tried-and-true backup method in place. If not, I shared some thoughts on the subject last month in Backups: So Many Storage Options Yet Only One Chance.

For a far more in depth perspective, I would encourage you all to read the the various Technical Guidelines for Producers and Engineers set forth by The Recording Academy, which are free for members and non-members alike. Especially helpful in the archive process and the explanation of various long term storage media is the Digital Audio Workstation Guidelines for Music Production (pdf), of which there is an abbreviated Quick Reference Guide (pdf).

What I find most striking as I contemplate the concept of backing up is that some of the people I know who are the most judicious about recording data backups are rather haphazard in backing up their own personal systems, or even their most critical files.

Says Kevin Purdy of Lifehacker:

Why World Backup Day? Unfortunately, it’s necessary, as BackBlaze pointed out during Backup Awareness Month last year, with only 8 percent of those surveyed backing up their data daily. Hard drives and other storage, every single device, will fail at some point, and will never provide a fair warning about it. So find a way to put your data in two extra places: one convenient and nearby, another far away from your house or office.

Sage advice, really. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, there are two kinds of people – those who have experienced a hard drive failure and those who will. So on this remembrance of World Backup Day, be sure to take the opportunity and ensure that all your date is secure: both personal and professional.

Via Lifehacker.

A Look At iZotope RX 2 Advanced

blog, pswblog · 2011-02-28

Imagine for a moment one of the “must have” tools in your arsenal. I’d bet a large number of you out there jumped to ProTools (perfectly valid), or a favorite piece of outboard gear (I’ve been there). However, one of my “can’t live without it” tools is noise removal and spectral repair, which is why I was so thrilled to have the opportunity to check out iZotope RX 2 when it came out this past fall.

However, the reason for my excitement was far different that you may imagine. After all, yes, everyone likes to be the first to check out new gear. Rather, I was intrigued because I’d already been an avid RX Advanced user for a number of years, and my mind reeled at what they could have done to possibly improve upon the software.

Boy was I surprised!

Two new features I’ve really enjoyed in the new version are improved batch processing and the upgraded selection methods. The new method of batch processing has made an impact on my workflow because you can chain multiple modules together as well as process multiple files while using multiple CPUs which can really save some time. Also, the new selection methods which include a lasso, brush and magic wand tools have made it far easier to edit quickly and accurately. My favorite is the magic wand which can automatically select a sound and its harmonics.

As always, there are several features in RX Advanced which really make the jump to Advanced worthwhile. The new adaptive denoiser mode, which is a part of their all new denoising algorithms, is a whiz at dealing with dynamic background noise. Additionally, azimuth alignment, which is a component of the new channel and phase operations feature, does a great job of correcting misaligned tape heads if you find yourself regularly restoring tape.

There are so many great additions to this update that I was left wondering how I’d ever worked without them, like session support, third party plug-in support, and if you’re using RX 2 Advanced for forensic work then the ability to export your work history as an XML file will come as a welcome addition.


My first true test of iZotope RX 2 Advanced came while hurriedly editing a project for my wife. A middle school teacher, she’d recorded her students reading aloud for a podcast. Knowing it was just a school project we opted to go the quick and dirty route for recording, an iPhone. While the source was captured just fine, I’d underestimated the level of background noise in the 1920’s building. Against a rather tight deadline, I was able to run several hour long files through RX 2 Advanced, using the new adaptive denoiser mode, some moderate EQ, and the occasional spectral repair, which all came out sounding far better than I had expected given their original state.

In speaking with a colleague of mine after cleaning up these recording I said “I’ve got to write about this and tell everyone about this great software!”, to which he replied, “No, I don’t want anyone to know. Its my secret!” That seems to be a common sentiment among iZotope RX users, as those who use it regularly are constantly pleased and amazed by its power, but always hopeful they can keep the app as their own secret silver bullet of post production.

Give it a shot; I’m certain you’ll see what I mean.

iZotope RX 2 / RX 2 Advanced Specifications
Windows (XP, x64, Vista, 7)
Mac OS X 10.5 or later (Universal Binary)
Standalone application
Plug-in formats: Pro Tools 7+ (RTAS/ AudioSuite), VST, MAS, Audio Unit, DirectX

Disclosure: iZotope provided me with a copy of RX 2 Advanced for review as Associate Editor of ProSoundWeb.com.

backups: so many storage options yet only one chance

blog, pswfeature · 2011-02-10

It’s been said by IT professionals around the world that there are two kinds of people – those who have experienced a hard drive failure and those who will. Unfortunately, we surely all know at least one person who’s lost data in a catastrophic failure.

Personally, I’m a believer in the 3-2-1 backup strategy which has been expanded upon greatly by Richard Anderson in his article aimed at digital photographers.

Put simply, for every file you intend to preserve you must have three copies of that file, on two different forms of media, at least 1 of which is stored (securely) off-site. This protects the data (and your reputation) not just against hard drive crashes, but other disasters as well.

So, this begs the question, how are you backing up you data? If you’re reading this article, my guess is that you may already be wondering if you’re doing everything you can to protect your information. Don’t worry, I wont judge. If we’re going to be honest, I haven’t followed this backup strategy 100% until just recently. After all, it only takes just one near miss…

I received a rather frantic email recently from a client on this very subject. It was he who’d had this near miss when one of his hard drives failed; he nearly lost years of work. Unfortunately, a few files were corrupted on the drive and he wanted to know if I still had them.

Sure! Granted, the project was from 2004, but my data retention policies are such that I keep everything. More on that another time…

Anyways, I fired up one of my many offline storage drives, uploaded the files to FTP, and washed my hands of the task. However, days later, the age of my backup drives began to weigh on my conscience. After all, the data had been sitting there for quite some time, and what if the failure had occurred not to a client but to me? Then the data wouldn’t have been salvageable!

I decided to take a long, hard look at my data backup process. To clarify, this isn’t to be mistaken for how I backup my primary system drives, though I’m certain some of these changes will trickle down to that as well. Rather, this is strictly how I backup my non-system drives which contain all my online and offline sessions (You are recording to a non-system drive, right?). One of these days I’ll talk about system drive backups if anyone is really all that interested.

The Process
Essentially, I like to think through backups as a series of options. To achieve two local and one remote backup there are any number of solutions we can use. It’s all about weighing the pros and cons of each with regard to your individual needs. So, we’ll take a look at the various technologies available for backups. However, one thing to keep in mind when you’re actually shopping for drives, no matter the technology employed, is the platters employed within. The life expectancy of a drive is related to its MTBF or mean time before failure. However, the MTBF is just that – a mean – which represents the average failure rate for the entire population of drives tested.

OWC Mercury Elite Classic

This value is generally high, but it does tell you something about the likelihood that your drive will fail. There is no way to tell exactly how long a drive will last but if you’re shopping for drives taking a look at the enclosed platters’ MTBF data is a great idea. Now, on to the options!

Single Drives
A single hard drive is a great storage solution for its capacity (which is constantly expanding by the day). That is of course until it fails which is why it’s important to have 2 copies of your data backed up. If you only have a small studio, two single drives are not a bad backup at all.

However, even if you use another backup method, singular hard drives make a wonderful working or “online” drive. If you’re the type to build your own drive, I can’t recommend highly enough the Hitachi Ultrastar series of discs, but any enterprise-class disc is a safe bet. My personal choices for pre-made enclosures are the Other World Computing Mercury and Mercury Elite’s.

Computer Attached Multi-Disc Enclosures
Once you’ve outgrown a single disc solution, you know you’ve accumulated a lot of data! You could seemingly add another single disc to your workflow which is what I’ve been doing up until now. My tipping point was 6 single drives which made finding files rather convoluted.

A much better alternative is stepping up to a multi-disc enclosure. These often have the added benefit of expandability along with the data hoarders best friend, RAID technology. An acronym for Redundant Array of Independent Disks, a RAID array is a serious step up from a single platter.

Wiebtech RTX400-QR

It’s a technology that provides increased storage functions and reliability through redundancy which is achieved by combining multiple disk components into a single cohesive unit, where data is distributed across the drives in one of several ways called “RAID levels”.

There are numerous great (albeit pricy) units on the market today, some of my favorites being the Wiebtech RTX400-QR (at right) and any of the numerous options from Other World Computing. Having a RAID array is a perfect way to achieve two local copies of data, especially due to RAID technology’s ability to rebuild the array after a failure. You’ll notice I called these devices “computer attached.” So, what if you wanted a massive RAID backup bout wanted to place it on your network? Enter the NAS!

Network Attached Storage
If your studio workflow contains a multitude of computers and you want to backup all your projects to a singular location, a NAS is quite a solution. Depending on its configuration, it can function as either a RAID or (sorry, it’s acronym time again) as a large singular drive which is called JBOD or “Just a Bunch of Drives.”

QNAP TS-439 Pro II+ Turbo NAS

Depending upon your needs and the configuration of the NAS, projects can potentially be retrieved remotely with the proper credentials. My favorite candidate in this category has recently become the line by Qnap, one which I’m slated to deploy for a client in the coming month.

Welcome To The Cloud
When it comes to off-site backups, that’s when many people begin to falter. After all, it’s one thing to purchase a whiz-bang RAID enclosure and back everything up, but when you start talking about finding another place for your data to live which isn’t in your studio, that’s when things get a bit tricky.

Unless you’re going to constantly image your backup and rotate it offsite (I’ve received this suggestion by corporate IT folk), it’s likely you’re going to be looking at some form of storage “in the cloud“. Cloud storage has become extremely popular in the pat year although many will tell you it comes with risks. They’re correct, although it’s worth remembering that “cloud storage” is just another way of saying your information is stored in a large data center, some of which have serious backup plans of their own. They’re worthy of consideration.

Iron Mountain Data Bunker

One of my favorite options for online storage is Dropbox, which offers a modest amount of free space and paid plan beyond that. Another great cloud storage option is Jungle Disk. While I’ve never tried it, the features are quite solid, especially given the price. If you’re looking for a secure cloud server but don’t need something quite within the range of military grade, it’s worth considering.

While Dropbox and Jungle Disk are worthy backup options, what about the truly paranoid among us (myself included) when it comes to remote storage? Thankfully, there’s always at least one option out there which goes the extra mile; for critical backups I’m excited about the availability of Iron Mountain’s subterranean data bunker.

While seemingly extreme, if your data is mission critical (and you know it is), there’s a great deal of comfort in knowing your backups are safe offsite in a highly secure underground facility, and mirrored to a second data center for full fail-over redundancy while your data remains encrypted in transport and storage.

The Verdict
You may be wondering, having heard these options, exact what solution I settled upon. It was quite a struggle, but I decided the best option for me was a computer attached RAID coupled with a single disc for online work, and a third copy of my data mirrored in Iron Mountain. Why, you might ask? I decided that having a physically attached RAID was the best option as i only mix on one or tow computers.

Also, I feel the singular drive is necessary as I don’t want to run the risk of corrupting my backup by working from it on a daily basis. I’ll admit that Iron Mountain is a bit of a splurge when it comes to data archival, however, I decided it’s hard to put a price on knowing that there’s always another copy of everything I need, fully RAID’ed and geographically separated, so I know it’s safe. Basically, if I lose something, it means there’s been a catastrophic event so terrible that the data has probably become irrelevant. And frankly, I’m ok with those odds.

I’m certain that someone out there has noticed I skipped over a few backup options. For instance, DVD backup. Personally, I don’t find it convenient to burn a backup of every session twice, and then make amendments to that backup if I work on it again. Plus, a suitable offsite storage location is still required. I know safety deposit boxes are popular, but while this backup methodology is perfectly valid and reliable for smaller quantities of data, I don’t feel it’s worthwhile to entertain when dealing in terabytes.

No matter the route, whether it’s a few single hard drives coupled with Dropbox or an in-studio server farm which makes my storage upgrade look minuscule at best, I hope you’ve found these options insightful. After all, few experiences are more painful than data loss, and I hope when you’re greeted with the heart-wrenching clicking of an armature that you know everything is safe and sound on another drive.

Happy archiving!

session interchange options in a pinch

blog, pswblog · 2010-03-24

I know you’re going to be shocked to learn this, but there actually are DAW’s other than ProTools. You’re stunned, right? I just knew you would be. All kidding aside, I tend to do most of my work in ProTools. However, I do have occasion to mix in other DAW’s from time to time depending on the needs of clients. For instance, the other day I was mixing across town for a client and the session had been tracked in Logic. However, a separate session existed in ProTools in which some effects had already been edited.

So, what could I do to get everything working together in one session? Well, I had a few options…

  • Export the Logic session as an OMF
  • Export individual files from Logic
  • Export the ProTools session as an OMF
  • Export individual files from ProTools

Unfortunately, I didn’t have my iLok with me which contains my DigiTranslator license, so that scrapped any chance of using OMF. The Logic session contained several times more tracks than the ProTools session, so apparently I was going to export all my files individually from ProTools an reassemble them within Logic. However, they were already edited with fades applied and had been laid out properly within the timeline. How can you migrate all that data without losing something?

Very simple. Region Consolidation!

That’s right, the answer really is that simple!

  • Highlight all the tracks from Bar 1 to the end of the song.
  • Select Consolidate in the Edit menu which will cause new, individual, continuous files to be created.
  • Upon consolidation, your new continuous files will be highlighted in the Region List. Right Click on those highlighted files and select Export Regions as Files.

  • All that’s left is to save. I prefer to use the WAV format for interchange, but that’s a personal choice.

Who would have though it could be so easy to not purchase DigiTranslator? I kid, I kid… Of course, you do have to import your files into your other DAW of choice and drag them to Bar 1, but that’s fairly quick work. For those looking for a more streamlined alternative to the above described solution but still wishing to be thrifty, there’s also the very intriguing SSL Pro Convert. While I haven’t tried this offering from SSL, it certainly appears to be a cost effective alternative. Of course, the next time I forget my iLok, I’ll stick with the frugal choice; region consolidation.

Have an opinion on session interchange options? Please let me know in the comments!

thumbnail via Wikimedia Commons and EDL

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Connect

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

© 2003–2023 · Log in